And, the big question for Senator Obama is . . . . ?

August 25th, 2008

Guest posting by Angela Brightfeather

Angela has been an activist for the transgender community is some form or another for the last 42 years. Some of our community’s activists weren’t even born then. She has been on the board of NTAC, It’s Time, North Carolina and the several other organizations too numberous to mention. Currently, she serves as the Vice President of the Transgender American Veterans Association (TAVA) and is one of its Co-Founders. Also, Angela is one of my closest friends.

And, the big question for Senator Obama is . . . . ?

You know something? I am so tired of arguing with people about HRC and about their loyal transgender members and workers at the bottom of the food chain we call the “GLB community.” I am also getting tired of the absolute position of transgender leaders whom I know, about their insistence that we don’t need HRC and that they compare them to our worst enemies..

I actually agree with both sides of all this argument, which makes me stop and think a minute about why we need to argue in the first place?

Deep in the pit of my stomach, I have always sought the most acute area of pain in our community and focused the things I have done in that direction. As a professed and unashamed healer in our community, I really have no choice but to be drawn to ease the pain and that is how it has been for most of my life.

(Break)

So I have just one question about ENDA right now and I think it is something that we can all work on together, inside and outside of HRC. It’s really very simple and it doesn’t require anyone to do anything spectacular, but it seems to me like it is the logical next step.

I have recently mentioned on a number of occasions that Senator Barack Obama, now leading contender for the Presidency of the United States, has openly said that he fully supports an inclusive ENDA to include gender language, just as he championed our cause in his home state of Illinois.

Now to further that thought, the word came from the DNC Platform Committee that the party platform will include gender language in it for the first time. Gee, it would appear that we might have just been educating out there and some of it sunk into a few Democrat craniums after all. You think Congressman Frank took notice?

In the America that I helped defend, that I have grown up and worked in without to many complications over the last 63 years, a President of the United States, not sometimes, but always, trumps a Congressman from Massachusetts, who also just so happens to be a gay man.

Besides all that, aren’t the party leaders supposed to follow the rules of the Democratic Party Platform in making their decisions about legislation? You bet that Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, who allowed the shimming and shaking of her party when it came to writing, rewriting, amending and removing amendments before a vote on ENDA in the House, has new grounds for judging the situation. Last year, she easily backed down from Barney Frank’s lack of foresight about the bill. Both Frank and Pelosi need to follow the example of the person who may be the next President.

So doesn’t this argument between transgender people that is causing all this pain seem a bit ridiculous? Isn’t there only one question that we all truly need to know right now and who is going to be brave enough to ask it? Has anyone already asked it? If we get the answer that we need, then everyone can roll up their targets, go home and fight together inside and outside of HRC in a new direction. We can then apply pressure, protest, picket and ask the same question to Frank and Pelosi by asking them to pull the damn exclusive piece of junk that they have passed in the Congress, change it and do what the party and the President wants them to do. Never mind the incremental “crapola.” It should be a mute issue about inclusion.

That simple question is:

“Senator Obama, would you veto an exclusive version of the Employment Non Discrimination Act if it did not include employment protections for transgender people?”

It’s a tough question to ask a man who believes in not impeding any rights bill from passing, but it is an important question to ask. If the answer is anything but “Yes,” I will take my vote on November and either find someone else to vote for, or just sit this one out and encourage everyone to do the same until people come to realize that this makes common sense.

For now, I will pay $500.00 of my money, the money I was going to give to Obama, to the first person or a charity or campaign of their choice, who gets an answer to my exact question as stated. Put it on You Tube for posterity and for the record and send me an email telling me about how you got the statement and you get my money and profound gratitude.

Anyone want to add to that bounty?

4 Responses to “And, the big question for Senator Obama is . . . . ?”

  1. Zoe Brain Says:

    Breath-holding is contra-indicated.

  2. Karen Says:

    With regard to the question “Senator Obama, would you veto an exclusive version of the Employment Non Discrimination Act if it did not include employment protections for transgender people?”, you said: “If the answer is anything but ‘Yes,’ I will take my vote on November and either find someone else to vote for, or just sit this one out and encourage everyone to do the same until people come to realize that this makes common sense.”

    I think it is common sense to fight tooth-and-nail for a bill that covers gender identity and gender expression, but I don’t think the decision on veto or not is nearly as straightforward. It’s a hard decision between immediately granting equal rights for some people vs. delaying those equal rights, for a potentially indeterminate period of time, on the hope that you can get equal rights for more people.

    Imagine if last year’s ENDA debacle had NOT occurred in an environment where it was a symbolic measure sure to be vetoed. Would it have made sense to campaign against the non-inclusive ENDA? Would United ENDA have even come to be?

    As a trans person, I have a lot at stake here. I fought for inclusion last year, and I’ll fight for inclusion when the next version on ENDA comes about. And I fully realize that if a non-inclusive ENDA becomes law, employment non-discrimination for me may will not arrive in my lifetime. But I don’t think that vetoing a non-inclusive ENDA is “common sense”; it’s a really tough decision.

  3. Nancy Nangeroni Says:

    Angela,

    With all due respect, how would denying protections to some GLB people advance the cause of transgender rights? And what does insisting on this stance say about our ability to collaborate with others - including the ability to make strategic compromises where necessary, in order to move forward?

    -Nancy

  4. Monica Roberts Says:

    And with all due respect Nancy, lhow about you answer this question for me..

    How does leaving out the people who it has been documented to need the civil rights coverage far worse than straight acting GLB males and females, and who are facing the brunt of discrimination and violence advance the cause of GLBT rights?

Leave a Reply