Stuck in Binary
April 7th, 2009By Monica F. Helms
Think of how dull the world would be if everything came in just twos. We would only have two different colors, two different smells, two different tastes and two different sounds. People would appear in just two different varieties for each sex, and only thinking in just two different ways. From our diverse perspective, it would be a boring existence, except that in that world, boredom would only come in two forms as well.
Being a science fiction fan and writer, I can easily imagine how a world of true binaries would look. I’m envisioning a novel coming from that right now. We should consider ourselves lucky that Mother Nature can think beyond binaries. Unfortunately, even with all the evidence in front of us, Human Nature cannot think beyond binaries.
I should clarify that last sentence. When it comes to all that exists around us, we easily bask in the beauty of a world that goes way beyond binaries. We see flowers of all colors and varieties. Our pets come in all shapes, sizes, species and temperament. One could take a decade sampling all the varieties of food the world has to offer. Yes, we don’t live in a binary world, yet in some forms, binary thinking exists in people.
(Break)
If Mother Nature can think beyond binaries in every form of creation, then it stands to reason that sex, gender and sexual orientation also go beyond binaries. Try telling that to most of humanity, including some gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and straight people. Yes, even some transgender people cannot think beyond binaries, which has caused some rather heated discussions on blogs and lists at times.
Noticed I didn’t include intersex people on that list. Overall, I have found that because an intersex person can have so many different issues that would make them intersex, their life situations force them to think beyond binaries. I have learned a lot from my intersex friends, and they still have more to teach me.
So, where does a lot of this binary thinking come from? Easy. “The Bible says that God only created man and woman. The Bible says that men cannot lie with men and women cannot lie with women. The Bible says that men cannot wear the clothes of women and women cannot wear the clothes of men.” How often have we heard these examples from the Bible used as weapons to beat us over the head with? Yet, we hear nothing about stoning our children if they disobey, nothing about not eating pork and shell fish, nothing about not divorcing and remarrying, and nothing about not wearing clothes made with different materials. Seems those get swept under the evangelistic rug for convenience sake. Welcome to the “pick and choose” religious world.
Because binary viewpoints on sex, gender and sexual orientation exists with a majority of humans, we get amendments to state constitutions that say men can only marry women, and visa versa. Yet, in all of those state constitutions, you will NOT SEE a definition for what constitutes a man and what constitutes a woman. If you try to pinpoint a definition for them, you will find many exceptions to whatever one you pick, leaving out some of those fine, upstanding evangelist citizens in the process.
Why? Because Mother Nature (God) never follows a binary model when creating humans. Scientists have even identified over 600 species of plants and animals that can change sex based on the needs of the species, further blurring the binary lines. If binaries don’t exist in nature, then why have so many states based laws and amendments on vague and undefined terms such as “man” and “woman?” Who allowed them to get away with it?
Let’s also look at God for a moment. If you were God and could create anything, ANYTHING, then that means you would have no limits. You are not stuck with binary thinking and can mix and match all sorts of features when creating humans. Yet, a misguided portion of society wants to put limits on God’s abilities when it comes to the sex, gender and sexual orientation of people. How arrogant are those people? On top of that, if you don’t choose the right one of the two – such as sexual orientation – then you’re not following God’s plan, as if they had absolute proof of how God thinks.
There are five known sexual orientations – heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality and pansexuality. For those who don’t know, pansexuality, or omnisexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by the potential for aesthetic attraction, romantic love, or sexual desire for people, regardless of their gender identity or biological sex. Pansexuality has been described as a “means to skip the binaries and essentialism of bisexuality.” I personally see an overlapping of the two.
When the Ex-Gay Movement comes up in conversation, people’s binary views of sexual orientation frustrate me to no end. You have straight people saying they can cure a person from being gay and gay people saying that a person will always be gay. Neither side cares to even acknowledge the possibility that maybe, just maybe, the person isn’t gay or straight, but somewhere in between.
The AMA recognizes twelve to fourteen various chromosome patterns to designate a person’s sex. If XX designates female and XY designates male, then what sex are the others? The AMA, in order to bend to the pressures of the Religious Right, has designated some of the other patterns male and the others as female. But, are they right? I refuse to believe they can be so positive on the person’s sex if they do not have either XX or XY. And, Mother Nature, in all of its non-binary wisdom, has even created male-bodied people with XX chromosomes and female-bodied people with XY chromosomes. I have a female-bodied friend who has XY chromosomes. This proves that using chromosomes to justify a binary model for sex just cannot be done.
Failing the medical determination, we can go with a person’s gender, specifically their gender identity. What their mind says has to be the strongest deciding factor when medical evidence becomes too vague. Even there, no binary exist, otherwise Leslie Feinberg wouldn’t have embraced gender-neutral pronouns. Some people feel they have a neutral, an undefined or fluid gender, thus shattering binaries in gender as well.
Binaries for sex, gender and sexual orientation are nothing more than creations by people who will not accept a variety of possibilities, or want to make it easy to place people in neat little boxes. Nature has no concept of boxes. The lines between everything in nature become blurred and undefined when studying them carefully. Too bad some people ignore solid evidence in order to push their brand of intolerance, but that has been happening for thousands of years. The more we push aside binary thinking and embrace the wide diversity of nature, the harder it will be for the bigots to thrive. Don’t expect that to happen anytime soon.
April 7th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
this gender variant person who doesn’t have any idea what the heck gender zie is thanks you for this wonderful inclusive post!!!!
April 8th, 2009 at 6:24 am
FANTASTIC! Well done! I’ve been saying this for years!!
April 9th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
Regarding “Angie” Zapata, while violence is absolutely not condoned, I believe she had a hand in her own death by not being honest. Any transgender person in a dating situation needs to be brutally honest while dating someone to avoid this situation. I have been in this situation and before any physical contact happened, I asked the person if she was transgender. She replied “no” and asked for me to turn off the lights so we could make love. I did so and waited 10 seconds and then flipped the lights back on and saw a penis staring at me. I was very angry at this dishonesty and betrayal. Again, let me state again that there is no excuse for brutality, but honesty would eliminate 99% of these situations.
April 9th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
This reminds me of one of my favorite Calvin and Hobbes cartoons (from http://www.gourismitha.com/CalvinandHobbes/Calvin_Dad.html):
Calvin: How come old photographs are always black and white? Didn’t they have color film back then?
Dad: Sure they did. In fact, those old photographs are in color. It’s just that the world was black and white then. The world didn’t turn color until sometime in the 1930s, and it was pretty grainy color for a while, too.
Calvin: But then why are old paintings in color?! If the world was black and white, wouldn’t artists have painted it that way?
Dad: Not necessarily. A lot of great artists were insane.
Calvin: But… But how could they have painted in color anyway? Wouldn’t their paints have been shades of gray back then?
Dad: Of course, but they turned colors like everything else did in the ’30s.
Calvin: So why didn’t old black and white photos turn color too?
Dad: Because they were color pictures of black and white, remember?
April 11th, 2009 at 8:32 am
Yes, the “gender binary” is bad biology! I have reviewed the scientific research on the subjects of intersexuality, sexual identity and sexual orientation. See my blog and its work-in-progress PowerPoint presentations.
April 11th, 2009 at 10:01 am
Binaries?Multiples? An interesting viewpoint, but there are greater issues you might want to consider.
Think binary: light/dark,on/off,life/death,being/nothingness & last but not least MALE/FEMALE.
If you need to know I am intersexed; Kallman’s & Turner’s Syndromes. But I do not define nor limit myself by any genetic disorder I have; and I still know the difference between normal &
abnormal.
If there were multiple/spectrum of sexes in existence why is it that in the “Natural World”, you know,the one that exists outside the internet,and predominantly in rural areas…, it takes only male & female to produce viable offspring? Otherwise it would be something out of Sci-Fi,like “Alien Nation” where it took 3 individuals for reproduction.Yes, there are multiple colors&crystal types in nature, but to transfer that principle to human sexuality
is sophistry at its worst.
April 11th, 2009 at 11:09 am
From the Mind of
Jami
Hi Monica,
While I am not a sci fi writer, I am also a fan. I do agree with your perspective on the binary, and how boring it would be.
About 40 years ago, I read Flatland and, as an Architect, it caused me to be very appreciative of how interesting a 3-dimensional world is and, being scientifically curious about space and time, it caused me to seek more theories on more dimensions. Additionally, it caused me to realize the effects or entrenched ideologies, and arrogance, of “upper” members in a social caste system. (Hmm sounds strangely familiar to what happens even within the gender variant community).
Three dimensions are something we just take for granted, but we theorize, postulate and can conceive that there are likely many more. We just don’t really “see” them. What could anyone really know about what lies beyond anyone’s (and this) current existence. No one has been there and back, with evidence to prove, inconclusively, anything beyond here and now.
So, it seems society seems to also take for granted the concept of binary. They just don’t “see” something else. but everyone knows non-binary exists.
As with you, I realized long ago, that the world is not binary; there is an infinite number of “points” between every “pole” of every aspect of our being.
Very good article, thank you.
Take care; please be, and ALWAYS stay, safe and well.
Huggs,
jami
“All you need is Love; Love is all you need.”
(Write it, say it, feel it, give it, every moment… and you Live it)
April 12th, 2009 at 9:06 am
jeno denuzzi seems to be implying that heterosexual reproduction is nature’s only existing method to produce viable offspring by saying-
“If there were multiple/spectrum of sexes in existence why is it that in the “Natural World”, you know,the one that exists outside the internet,and predominantly in rural areas…, it takes only male & female to produce viable offspring? Otherwise it would be something out of Sci-Fi,like “Alien Nation” where it took 3 individuals for reproduction.”
In nature there are animals and plants that reproduce asexually with no cellular union involved, as well as plants and animals that are hermaphroditic…in the case of plants they are often perfectly capable of pollinating themselves, and in animals like sea slugs an individual may not be able to impregnate itself but can serve in both male and female roles when it comes to mating with another of its type.
There are also animals that can change sex depending on reproductive necessity, or do so as a matter of their normal life cycle, like clownfish and wrasses.
As for the need for “3 individuals for reproduction” being some absurd alien concept, this is precisely how many plants reproduce…and they don’t just need a third party to reproduce, they need a third party of an entirely different taxonomic *kingdom* to reproduce- hence the term “the birds and the bees”.
Point being that in what is loosely defined as “nature”, the notion of strict sexual dimorphism and two party sexual reproduction being the norm is what is really “abnormal”…nature doesn’t insist on it and in fact uses all kinds of schemes to reproduce organisms that fall all over the spectrum between male and female, yet when it comes to humans we are supposed to believe that anything other than strict dimorphic polarization and heteronormative behaviors is some abnormal affront to nature…? Please.